Question...wasn't Elisha very cruel when he sent those bears against
those little kids who were teasing him about being bald?
Date: Oct 26, 1999
This question came in:
I've always been a little worried about the events in 2Kings 2:23-25,
where Elisha is jeered and then ends up using a curse that kills 42 kids
near Bethel. I understand this certainly identified him as a prophet to
the people in that area, but it does, at least to me, seem cruel given
the harmless taunt.Maybe Elisha was "real" sensitive about his male pattern
baldness? yuk yuk
Anyway, I'd enjoy hearing your take on this, even if it does take
you months to answer it.
..............................................................................................................................................................
This event is often construed very negatively:
"How can I believe in a God who would send bears to devour little
children for innocently teasing an old man whose appearance probably was
unusual even for that day" (HSOBX)
But a closer look at the passage show that most of the assumptions in that
position are false, and that other elements (not explicit in the words,
but present in the historical situation) illumine the situation.
First, the passage itself:
"He went up from there to Bethel; and while he was going up on
the way, some small boys came out of the city and jeered at him, saying,
"Go away, baldhead! Go away, baldhead!" 24 When he turned around and saw
them, he cursed them in the name of the Lord. Then two she-bears came out
of the woods and mauled forty-two of the boys.
Now, let's look at some of the elements of the historical background, and
the various players in the event:
1. First of all, they weren't "little kids"!
"'Little children' is an unfortunate translation. The Hebrew expression
neurim
qetannim is best rendered 'young lads' or 'young men.' From numerous
examples where ages are specified in the Old Testament, we know that these
were boys from twelve to thirty years old. One of these words described
Isaac at his sacrifice in Genesis 22:12, when he was easily in his early
twenties. It described Joseph in Genesis 37:2 when he was seventeen years
old. In fact, the same word described army men in 1 Kings 20:14-15...these
are young men ages between twelve and thirty." [HSOBX]
2. Elisha wasn't "old"--he was the same age as they were!
"But was Elisha an old man short on patience and a sense of humor?
This charge is also distorted, for Elisha can hardly have been more
than twenty-five when this incident happened. He lived nearly sixty
years after this..." [HSOBX]
3. Elisha had JUST FINISHED doing a mercy-miracle for the entire city of
nearby Jericho!!!!
"The chapter closes with two miracles of Elisha. These immediately
established the character of his ministry--his would be a helping ministry
to those in need, but one that would brook no disrespect for God and
his earthly representatives. In the case of Jericho, though the city had
been rebuilt (with difficulty) in the days of Ahab (1 Kings 16:34, q.v.),
it had remained unproductive. Apparently the water still lay under Joshua's
curse (cf. Josh 6:26), so that both citizenry and land suffered greatly
(v. 19). Elisha's miracle fully removed the age-old judgment, thus allowing
a new era to dawn on this area (vv. 20-22). Interestingly Elisha wrought
the cure through means supplied by the people of Jericho so that their
faith might be strengthened through submission and active participation
in God's cleansing work. (EBCOT)
4. This event took place around a cult city (somewhere between Bethel and
Jericho, a distance of aproximately 10 miles), a center of anti-YHWH worship:
"Elisha's sweet memories of Jericho received a souring touch at Bethel
(v. 23). The public insult against Elisha was aimed ultimately at
the God whom he represented. Indeed Elisha's whole prophetic ministry was
in jeopardy; therefore the taunt had to be dealt with decisively. The sudden
arrival of the two bears who mauled forty-two youths to death would serve
as both an awful sentence on unbelievers--and thus, too, on Jeroboam's
cult city--and a published reminder that blasphemy against the true
God and his program would be met with swift and certain consequences (v.
24)." [EBCOT]
5. The harmless "teasing" was hardly that--they were direct confrontation
between the forces of Baal and the prophet of YHWH that had just healed
the water supply (casting doubt on the power and beneficence of Baal!).
This was a mass demonstration (if 42 were mauled, how many people were
in the crowd to begin with? 50? 100? 400?).:
"As Elisha was traveling from Jericho to Bethel several dozen youths
(young men, not children) confronted him. Perhaps they were young false
prophets of Baal. Their jeering, recorded in the slang of their day, implied
that if Elisha were a great prophet of the Lord, as Elijah was, he should
go on up into heaven as Elijah reportedly had done. The epithet baldhead
may allude to lepers who had to shave their heads and were considered detestable
outcasts. Or it may simply have been a form of scorn, for baldness was
undesirable (cf. Isa. 3:17, 24). Since it was customary for men to cover
their heads, the young men probably could not tell if Elisha was bald or
not. They regarded God's prophet with contempt....Elisha then called
down a curse on the villains. This cursing stemmed not from Elisha pride
but from their disrespect for the Lord as reflected in their treatment
of His spokesman (cf. 1:9-14). Again God used wild animals to execute His
judgment (cf., e.g., 1 Kings 13:24). That 42 men were mauled by the two
bears suggests that a mass demonstration had been organized against
God and Elisha." [Bible Knowledge Commentary]
6. There may have been elements of public safety involved:
"A careful study of this incident in context shows that it was far
more serious than a "mild personal offense." It was a situation of serious
public danger, quite as grave as the large youth gangs that roam
the ghetto sections of our modern American cities. If these young hoodlums
were ranging about in packs of fifty or more, derisive towards respectable
adults and ready to mock even a well-known man of God, there is no telling
what violence they might have inflicted on the citizenry of the religious
center of the kingdom of Israel (as Bethel was), had they been allowed
to continue their riotous course. " [EBD]
7. Elisha didn't actually call out the bears--he merely pronounced judgment
on these demonstrators. God decided what form the response took:
"Perhaps it was for this reason that God saw fit to put forty-two
of them to death in this spectacular fashion (there is no evidence that
Elisha himself, in imposing a curse, prayed for this specific mode of punishment),
in order to strike terror into other youth gangs that were infesting the
city and to make them realize that neither Yahweh Himself nor any of His
anointed prophets were to be threatened or treated with contempt." [EBD]
8. This curse/judgment was part of the covenant stipulations--it was a
reminder of Israel's responsibilities (and opportunities for blessings,
as well):
"Elisha pronounced a curse similar to the covenant curse of
Lev 26:21-22. The result gave warning of the judgment that would come on
the entire nation should it persist in disobedience and apostasy (see 2Ch
36:16). Thus Elisha's first acts were indicative of his ministry that would
follow: God's covenant blessings would come to those who looked to him
(vv. 19-22), but God's covenant curses would fall on those who turned
away from him. [NIV Study Bible notes, in loc.]
"If you remain hostile toward me and refuse to listen to me, I will
multiply your afflictions seven times over, as your sins deserve. 22 I
will send wild animals against you, and they will rob you of your children,
destroy your cattle and make you so few in number that your roads will
be deserted." (Lev 26.21f)
9. This visible display of YHWH's power and reality (like the previous
display of His kindness and activity for them) was designed to avert a
far greater calamity:
"The savagery of wild animals was brutal enough, but it was mild compared
to the legendary cruelty of the Assyrians who would appear to complete
God's judgment in 722 BC The disastrous fall of Samaria would have been
avoided had the people repented after the bear attack and the increasingly
sever divine judgments that followed it. But instead of turning back to
God, Israel, as would Judah in a later day, 'mocked God's messengers,
despised his words and scoffed at his prophets until the wrath of
the LORD was arounsed against his people and there was no remedy' (2 Chron
36:16)" [HSOBX]
So, this was hardly the atrocity that it is often construed as--the historical
data casts the event into a TOTALLY different light. It WAS a very significant
event for the religious fortune (and therefore, future welfare) of the
Northern Kingdom...and it called for decisive revelation from God about
the severity of the people's condition and situation...
hope this helps, glenn
The
Christian ThinkTank...[http://www.Christianthinktank.com]
(Reference
Abbreviations)